🪄 Warner Bros. sued because of Harry Potter

Today’s market performance 🏆️

S&P 500: +0.42% 📈
Nasdaq 100: +0.26% 📈
Dow 30: +0.04% 📈
Russell 2000: +0.22% 📈

In partnership with

TOP STORY
🪄 Warner Bros. sued because of Harry Potter

Warner Bros. can’t seem to catch a break right now. 

On the same day that legendary actress Maggie Smith, a.k.a. Professor McGonagall, passed away, Warner Bros. was hit with a lawsuit from Sky Group.

On Friday, Sky Group sued Warner Bros. for breach of contract, accusing the studio of refusing to partner on the upcoming “Harry Potter” TV series. 

A brief timeline:

• 2021: Sky and Warner enter an agreement that “requires Warner Bros. to offer four Max series per year to be co-financed and co-produced by Sky, with the shows being distributed exclusively to Sky viewers in the UK and other European territories.” 

• April 2023: Warner Bros. publicly announced the upcoming “Harry Potter” TV series, generating excitement about its potential release.

• May 2023: Sky executives contacted Warner Bros. to inquire why the "Harry Potter" series had not been offered to Sky under their partnership. 

Warner Bros. executives claimed the series wasn’t officially ordered or greenlit yet, so it didn’t fall under the co-financing deal with Sky despite publicly announcing that the series was coming out. 

So, Warner announced the show, with a deal already in place with Sky, and then just ghosted them? Seems odd and also very costly.

Warner's refusal to include the "Harry Potter" series in their agreement will reportedly cost Sky hundreds of millions of dollars.

Why, Warner? “Warner’s reason for refusing to honor its obligations to Sky could not be more clear. Warner has chosen to keep the Harry Potter series for itself and make the blockbuster series the cornerstone of its own Max rollout in Europe.”

Damn, Sky is really running Warner Bros.'s name through the mud.

What does Warner Bros. have to say for themselves? 

• The studio says the claims are absolute rubbish, calling the lawsuit “a baseless attempt by Sky and Comcast to gain leverage.” 

• They argue it's simply a tactic to gain some leverage in ongoing negotiations for Warner Bros. content because the two sides' current deal expires in 2025.

• Who could blame 'em for wanting more Harry Potter?

After all, it is the best series of all time.

FROM OUR FRIENDS @ 1440 MEDIA

For Those Who Seek Unbiased News.

Be informed with 1440! Join 3.5 million readers who enjoy our daily, factual news updates. We compile insights from over 100 sources, offering a comprehensive look at politics, global events, business, and culture in just 5 minutes. Free from bias and political spin, get your news straight.

Join for free today!

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
🔴 OpenAI expects a $5 billion loss this year

Amid political turmoil and controversy, we just found out that OpenAI is also expected to lose $5 billion this year.

Oh god, Sam (Altman), what is going on, man? Earlier this week, CNBC confirmed that OpenAI expects about $5 billion in losses on $3.7 billion in revenue this year.

That’s a whole lotta money, and I don’t really know what to do with it.

Isn’t making billions a good thing? Why the significant loss? 

• Making a ton on the top line (revenue) is a great thing, but it doesn’t tell the whole story.

• Despite its hundreds of millions of monthly users and billions in revenue, OpenAI is still not making much profit because of the massive costs associated with developing advanced AI models, research, infrastructure, and talent.

• So, despite ChatGPT’s rapid ascension, OpenAI’s business model is still far from profitability.

But there’s no need to fear; OpenAI’s path to eventual profitability is very similar to that of most successful tech startups: high revenue and low margins in the beginning.

Don’t worry; their profit time will come.

WORD OF THE DAY

ENTERTAINMENT
🦸 DC and Marvel lose "Superhero" trademarks

In a shocking move, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has canceled the long-held joint trademark of the word "Superhero."

This very well may be the biggest bombshell of the entire year.

Marvel and DC Comics first registered the trademark for “Superhero” in 1977 and have successfully defended it on multiple occasions.

But now, they’re gonna lose their claim on the word.

How did this happen?

Two words: Superbabies Limited.

Superbabies is a small company that produces a series of comics about, you guessed it, superhero babies. 

Seems like a dope company to me, but to DC, eh, not so much?

• DC “attempted to block Richold’s efforts to promote The Super Babies” because they thought the company infringed on their superhero trademark.

• So, Superbabies creator S.J. Richold decided to challenge the two comic giants’ claim to the trademarks. 

• And with help from the law firm RJLF, he won the case by arguing that words like "Superhero" are too common to be trademarked.

DC and Marvel didn’t even bother to respond to the challenge by the July 24th deadline, so the court had no choice but to rule in favor of Superbabies Limited.

Meaning “Superheros” for all!